Instructions: Course Project Final Narrated Presentation PowerPoint presentation

Instructions: Course Project Final Narrated Presentation PowerPoint presentation should be narrated and 15-minutes in length. Presentation should be developed based on the Week 5: Course Project Outline, with feedback from the Peer Review Discussion taken into consideration. Grading details are outlined in the rubric below. Grading Rubric: Course Project Final Narrated Presentation Category Points % Criteria Documentation and Formatting 40 27% Quality work will include a title slide, an outline slide (of what will be presented), and a reference slide that includes all citations and sources used. The presentation should be narrated and about 15 minutes in length. Audio will be free of any background noises and the speaker must speak in a clear and understandable fashion. Organization and Cohesiveness 30 20% Quality work will include an introduction based on a well-formed thesis statement. The logical order of the content will be derived from the thesis statement. The content will be properly subdivided. With quality work, the conclusion will summarize the previously presented content and will complement the thesis statement from the introduction. Editing 20 13% Quality work will be free of any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Content 60 40% Quality work will have a significant scope and depth of research to support any statements. Content must include a comparison of abnormal physiology and normal physiology of the disease and explain the physiology and chemical pathways of various treatments associated with it. Relevant illustrations or examples are encouraged. Quality work will employ a sound use of reasoning and logic to reinforce conclusions. Total 150 100% A quality presentation will meet or exceed all the above requirements. Action Course Project – Final Narrated Presentation Remember to submit your assignment. Rubric BIOS267_W8_Course Project Presentation (202130) BIOS267_W8_Course Project Presentation (202130) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocumentation and Formatting 40 to >35.0 pts Excellent Quality work will include a title slide, an outline slide (of what will be presented), and a reference slide that includes all citations and sources used. The presentation should be narrated and about 15 minutes in length. Audio will be free of any background noises and the speaker must speak in a clear and understandable fashion. 35 to >30.0 pts Good Work is of good quality, with limited issues in the following: – Presentation includes a title slide, an outline slide (of what will be presented), and a reference slide that includes all citations and sources used. – Presentation should be narrated and be about 15 minutes in length. – Audio in presentation should be free of any background noises and the speaker must speak in a clear and understandable fashion. 30 to >20.0 pts Fair Work is of fair quality, with some issues in the following: – Presentation includes a title slide, an outline slide (of what will be presented), and a reference slide that includes all citations and sources used. – Presentation should be narrated and be about 15 minutes in length. – Audio in presentation should be free of any background noises and the speaker must speak in a clear and understandable fashion. 20 to >0 pts Poor Work is of poor quality, lacking in a number of the following: – Presentation includes a title slide, an outline slide (of what will be presented), and a reference slide that includes all citations and sources used. – Presentation should be narrated and be about 15 minutes in length. – Audio in presentation should be free of any background noises and the speaker must speak in a clear and understandable fashion. 40 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Cohesiveness 30 to >25.0 pts Excellent Quality work will include an introduction based on a well-formed thesis statement. The logical order of the content will be derived from the thesis statement. The content will be properly subdivided. With quality work, the conclusion will summarize the previously presented content and will complement the thesis statement from the introduction. 25 to >20.0 pts Good Work is of good quality, with limited issues in the following: – An introduction based on a well-formed thesis statement. – Content is properly subdivided, and there is a logical order derived from the thesis statement. – The conclusion summarizes the previously presented content and complements the thesis statement from the introduction. 20 to >15.0 pts Fair Work is of fair quality, with some issues in the following: – An introduction based on a well-formed thesis statement. – Content is properly subdivided, and there is a logical order derived from the thesis statement. – The conclusion summarizes the previously presented content and complements the thesis statement from the introduction. 15 to >0 pts Poor Work is of poor quality, with extensive issues throughout the following: – An introduction based on a well-formed thesis statement. – Content is properly subdivided, and there is a logical order derived from the thesis statement. – The conclusion summarizes the previously presented content and complements the thesis statement from the introduction. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEditing 20 pts Excellent Quality work will be free of any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. 15 pts Good Work is of good quality, with limited spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors. 10 pts Fair Work is of fair quality, with some limited spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors. 0 pts Poor Work is of poor quality, with numerous spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 60 to >50.0 pts Excellent Quality work will have a significant scope and depth of research to support any statements. Content must include a comparison of abnormal physiology and normal physiology of the disease and explain the physiology and chemical pathways of various treatments associated with it. Relevant illustrations or examples are encouraged. Quality work will employ a sound use of reasoning and logic to reinforce conclusions. 50 to >40.0 pts Good Work is of good quality, with limited issues in the following: – The work has a significant scope and depth of research to support statements. – The content includes a comparison of abnormal physiology and normal physiology of the disease. – The content includes an explanation of the physiology and chemical pathways of various treatments associated with the disease. – Content includes relevant illustrations or examples. – Quality work employs a sound use of reasoning and logic to reinforce conclusions. 40 to >0.0 pts Fair Work is of fair quality, with some issues in the following: – The work has a significant scope and depth of research to support statements. – The content includes a comparison of abnormal physiology and normal physiology of the disease. – The content includes an explanation of the physiology and chemical pathways of various treatments associated with the disease. – Content includes relevant illustrations or examples. – Quality work employs a sound use of reasoning and logic to reinforce conclusions. 0 pts Poor Work is of poor quality, with numerous issues in the following: – The work has a significant scope and depth of research to support statements. – The content includes a comparison of abnormal physiology and normal physiology of the disease. – The content includes an explanation of the physiology and chemical pathways of various treatments associated with the disease. – Content includes relevant illustrations or examples. – Quality work employs a sound use of reasoning and logic to reinforce conclusions. 60 pts Total Points: 150

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous post please review the following essay and edit it, the citations are wrong so please
Next post Most of these elements have been completed and revised. Please complete the miss